Advise as to what actions the patient and the family have against the manufacturer, the Hospital, or the doctor. Was the nurse also negligent? Could she bring an action against the hospital?

IntroductionIn order to advise whether Elizabeth, John, Lucy and Ben could bring some(prenominal) actions against XY Ltd Manufacturers, Get-well Mental Hospital, or Dr. microphone, we ought to ensure whether they have a prima facie case in the tort of negligence and determine whether they are owed any duties of denounce and the breach of such duties of tending has caused injuries to them. Injury to Primary VictimThe antediluvian victim in this case is Elizabeth. All doctors and hold ins owe their patients a duty of care (1). Failure to meet the professional ensample of care required of a medical practitioner constitutes a breach. Jacqueline the nurse: duty of careThe immediate cause of daub is ostensibly payable to Jacqueline?s negligence. It is foreseeable that Jacqueline?s negligence could orchestrate to Elizabeth?s injury. Applying the Bolam Test(2), Jacqueline, as the attending nurse in a kind hospital, in addition to following the doctor?s instruction, is pass ju dgment to take care of patients in distress diligently. Had Jacqueline non scared and negligently topples the cylinder, Elizabeth would not be injured. We could overly consider Jacqueline acted negligently by not informing Elizabeth?s cursorily downslope condition to Dr. microphone(3)?Could Elizabeth be liable to her own injury? respective(prenominal) are responsible for taking safety trouble to turn away foreseeable injuries. However, Elizabeth, not only an eight-year-old child scarce also a mental patient suffering side-effect of a medication, would not reasonably be expected to have the word of enjoy and experience to avoid the injury(4). She is unlikely to be found contributive negligent. Is Dr. Mike also liable to Elizabeth?s injury?Dr. Mike undoubtedly owes a duty of care to Elizabeth as any reasonable doctor in charge would(5). Looking beyond the immediate cause of injury, the ?but for?(6) principle applies: would Jacqueline still be panicked and topple the oxyge n tank had Elizabeth?s behavior not influe! nced by the... If you want to get a teeming essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay